(After reading the first printing of the paperback of this book, Bud Cloyd,
a crewmember in the engineering gang of the USS Edison (DD439) wrote the
author. Postwar, Robert "Bud" Cloyd founded, edited and published the Edison
newsletter in 1970. His World War II shipmates enjoyed his professional
publication for 10 years at which time Floyd turned the duty over to Jean
Whetstine, the widow of a shipmate. Issues have come regularly for almost 30
years. What follows is Cloyd's letter to the author dated January 15, 1999.)
A Throttleman's Response
I planned to write in response to your absolutely marvelous book. I found
that laying it down--even to eat--was a challenge. I laughed, I cried, I
called my neighbors, I talked to Harry Russell (a wartime shipmate) for two
hours on the phone, I wrote cards--I WENT NUTS! Damn--it was just great. My
neighbor across the street served on an APA. His service included trips to
Oran and Mers-el-Kebir among others with 1630-ton destroyers like the Edison
and my neighbor across the street "flew the hump" with the Air Force--so we
three could appreciate every page to the utmost.
Your almost casual approach in describing entry into service and the many
experiences therefrom certainly parallel all those of myself and most all of
the World War II vets that I have known. We never felt heroic, sacrificial or
any of the assortment of other feelings as a result of our going to war. You
expressed your feelings beautifully.
Over a span of many years, I corresponded with the Edison's skippers, and
regularly with Captains Al Murdaugh and Hap Pearce. I received quite a nice
letter from someplace in Europe from Captain Caspari. I served only briefly
with him, thank heavens, as we were approaching the Kyushu invasion with more
than dread. All of us old-timers felt we would never make it from that
operation. I left the ship at Saipan for transportation to the States on a
beautiful, nearly new APA that had a soda fountain and NO water hours. What a
treat that was. In one short letter, Captain Murdaugh apologized for not being
able to attend one of the ship's reunions because of an impending hip
operation. 'It might be that I'm seeking a miracle.' he stated, I have always
believed in miracles since the occasion the German sub fired a torpedo at us
--point blank-- and missed.' That is one of those offhand remarks direct from
our little ship that will make the hair rise on your back after you have given
it appropriate thought.
Your book adds a new dimension to all my memories of the Edison in that
they come from the viewpoint and experiences of the officer corps and many of
your reports are somewhat different from those of the crew. You are well
versed in much of the action that we were just not privy to-- especially we
who were below decks in the engineering spaces. All that we were aware of was
that we answered the bells and hoped for the best. Let me tell you that
answering Hap Pearce's bells could be a hair-raising experience. It was not at
all uncommon to be steaming flank ahead at 294 turns and get a full astern or
to be steaming flank ahead and get a full astern port, which was our screw in
the after engine room. How well I know as a former Edison throttleman. Hap
could not only provide us with a great thrill occasionally; he could also
occasionally scare the living hell out of a guy. Hap's abilities as a seaman
almost became legend. In thinking back, after all these years, and reading
your book that describes things from a wardroom standpoint, I have reached a
shaky conclusion that maybe, just maybe, the Edison was not quite as lucky as
the crew gave her credit for. Our good captain(s) and some officers quite
possibly created some of the narrow escapes we were blessed with.
It was my great good fortune to develop a treasured friendship on board
with Joe Ouellette. While we rarely got a chance to visit aboard ship, several
years later my wife and I spent a few days at Joe's home in Albany, NY, where
we consumed great quantities of Jim Beam and held discourse far into the night
on shipboard experiences. If we had a "Mr. Roberts" on the ship, Joe, of
course, was it. He was a wonderful guy, who as far as I know, never put anyone
on report and God knows he covered for a multitude of overleave drunks when he
was doing his hitch as OD. Joe never saw a crap game or a poker game that he
couldn't ignore and members of the crew owed Joe enough favors to last through
three lifetimes. He was one of only many fine officers we were blessed with,
however.
The crew of the Edison enjoyed considerably more freedom than some of the
destroyers did. I remember one, for instance, concerning either the Trippe or
the Wainwright (we operated with both, of course). Their captain decreed the
evening chow required uniform of the day and Friday field days--something
unheard of on the Edison. You should also remember the Skipper never believed
in Saturday (weekly, as provided by the "book") inspections but rather let us
know that if we did our jobs as he expected us to, inspections weren't
necessary. Let it be made a matter of record that NOBODY was allowed to let
Hap (Captain Hepburn A. "Hap" Pearce) down. Our morale was extremely high and
our performance exemplary.
While Stan Craw (Pearce's Executive Officer) was somewhat "standoffish"
from the crew (he had to be to enforce law and order) at the same time he was
a darn nice guy in my book. He has written to me numerous times and I receive
a Christmas card from him every year. I sent him a note calling attention to
the fact that I must be the last remaining enlisted man from the World War II
Navy to receive a Christmas card from his XO. How about that for morale?
One little sidelight from our visit with Joe Ouellette concerned my wife
who said later, "I thought all those sea stories I've been hearing for years
about you guys and the Edison were a bunch of lies and big stories. Now,
according to your favorite lieutenant, who told all the same stories, they're
actually the truth!" Also, at my begging, Joe gave me a framed 11x19"
photograph which I spotted in the basement while my wife was doing the
laundry. It was the old cruiser U.S.S. Seattle, remembered by thousands of
sailors as being tied up at Pier 92 in New York City. I'm considering donating
the picture to our local chapter of the Navy Club U.S.A. She was ship No. 12.
The reason for this (gift giving) is that when I'm gone, and I'm 80, it won't
mean anything to anyone else.
Getting back to some of those officers we shipped out with--some of them
were really great guys in spite of some of the crap they had to put up with
from a few bad apples in the crew. Hall, Dwyer and Hostvedt were fine
engineering officers. Pearson was another great guy to work with. Everybody
loved A. J. Waechter, master of the provender and scavenger extraordinaire who
could smell a supply ship out like a 'coon hound. Always seeming to keep a low
profile was Ed Meier, who after the war became a close friend and delightful
correspondent. One day he came by my office here in Lafayette (Indiana) and we
visited for two hours. Johnny Ward also showed up one day and I still have
some of the pictures he left me.
Speaking of Ed Meier reminds me when Captain Pearce (stoned to the gills
and mad because someone did not honor his request for beer for the crew)
decided to demonstrate to everyone in the MEK (Mers-el-Kebir, Algeria) basin
how a true Ship of the Line could get underway with a flourish. In the after
engine room, I was on pump watch, Renslow had the top watch, Tony Colpo was on
the throttles and some newcomer fireman second was the unfortunate victim of
an indoctrination experience as messenger of the watch that he would never
forget. In fact, I don't think he was able to even recover his voice and
composure for a week.
We had been idling at the pier, singled up (the lines had been reduced from
double to single) and spinning engines awaiting Hap's return from wherever
captains disappeared to when ashore. The Edison was a picture of total
serenity when someone yelled down the hatch, "Here comes the skipper and he's
mad as hell?"
Simultaneously with "Cast off" we got our first bell and engine order for
one Third Ahead Port and immediately the stern of the ship left the pier. All
of us in the engineers were so familiar with Hap's docking bells that once we
received that first bell everything else fell into place automatically. None
of us, however, had the vaguest notion of what was to happen when we floated
away from the dock some 200 feet. The next bell was Flank Ahead Starboard and
Full Astern Port and all hell broke loose. It is to be remembered in naval
engineering this procedure is for extreme emergency, not routine getting
underway. The Edison reared up on her fan tail, burner "batters' in the fire
rooms became hysterical, safety valves chattered against their restraints,
throttle men did a valiant though losing effort to keep from hurling boiler
water directly into the turbines and it was surprising the main blowers didn't
hurl unburned fuel through the stacks. What a mess?
Within what seemed to be moments, though it had to be longer than that, we
were headed for the sub nets (drawn across all harbor entrances) at flank
speed. Two sub net tender crewmen dove over the side in a fruitless effort to
get away from a destroyer run amok. Meier said he was nearly petrified as the
ship headed out and appeared to be heading directly toward the shoals that lay
at the foot of the well remembered cliff off to the starboard. Nobody
questions the captain's orders, of course, so Ed said he surreptitiously
managed to get the helmsman to gradually ease the ship a bit to port. The
Edison's wake nearly swamped the net tender. Meanwhile back in the after
engine room, we were trying to restore order which involved sliding the
upended floor plates back into their regular position, checking for exploded
gauges and retrieving the Joe pot, which had upended and rolled nearly to the
bilges.
It was often said that the reason the Edison turned out to be such a fine
performing little ship was due to the commissioning cadre of outstanding Chief
Petty Officers who really knew their seamanship. These men were also credited
as great instructors for the largely boot camp crew that took the ship to sea
on her early runs. I never was privileged to know the man but from the stories
I heard about Chief Bos'n Carajohn, the old boats did everything but walk on
water. The standards established by the first chief machinists for cleanliness
and maintenance, not to mention the all-around physical effort on the part of
the rates and strikers, resulted in the fact that the 439 could outrun every
ship of her class. We all took great pride in that.
Captain Pearce most definitely wished to keep a good crew together and
didn't want to take any chances on jeopardizing the ship's performance. The
result was, getting promoted in rate was a tough proposition. Our transfers to
new construction were scarce indeed and this led to some unrest among a few
senior crew members but it eventually worked itself out. The reluctance to
rate and transfer led to some strange situations at times. As far as I am able
to determine, I may have been the only third class machinist in the Navy to
stand throttle watch and my buddy Dick Braziel may have been the only second
class metalsmith to do likewise. Where we got a second class metalsmith was
always a mystery. (Author agrees, but keeping him was surely a part of
Pearce's penchant for "projects." A metal bender seemed like a heaven sent
archangel to the captain.)
One humorous exception to rare promotion involved one "Salt Spray Ray." He
was a seaman first with over ten year's service. Perhaps you will recall him
because he was one of the ship's "characters." In all his long service, no one
had been inspired to rate Ray who was becoming a little long in the tooth for
a plain seaman. He never was a striker for anything, coxswain, ship fitter,
radioman or gunner's mate. To find a place for the guy, our bos'n first at the
time, Galensky (famous for his clean snow-white cap daily) assigned Ray to the
paint locker with the admonition to run it to the best of his ability.
Strangely, "Salt Spray" loved the place and became an acceptable mixologist
for whatever paint the Navy had available at the moment. Everyone considered
Ray's case now satisfactorily closed--all except Hap Pearce and Stan Craw.
They decided that Salt Spray's assignment was akin to durance vile and that he
should be accorded recognition. Thus it came about that Salt Spray Ray was
"promoted" to Painter's Mate Third Class, a rate created on the spot
especially for Ray. Salt Spray was directed to wear a shipfitter's badge from
thence forward.
You mentioned something in the book about a dry riverbed. In all of my
reading of many volumes concerning Africa and the U.S. Southwest, dry
riverbeds have always been termed, "wadis." I am sure you will value this
information but the next item is a bit more interesting. As a member of the
No. 3 gun crew and handler of those five-inch projectiles with hours of
experience (those dudes could be darn tricky) I was one of the culprits who
smashed those white pine crates on the deck of that little non-descript
coastal freighter you referred to. When us guys picked up the first half dozen
boxes and slammed them on that steel deck, those foreign crewmen took off
running like their butts were scalded. I don't know where they thought they
were going but we guys got a big laugh out of the incident. Those men couldn't
communicate with us and we had no way of telling them the projectiles were
harmless until fuzed. Notwithstanding, when those same projectiles were thrown
in rough weather from the ready room racks and rolled and tumbled for hours on
end, it was unnerving. If it wasn't the projectiles loose, it was the depth
charges rolling and bouncing loose on the fantail. Also, while trying to get a
couple hours of sleep, it was most disconcerting when the midships slip joint
decided to tune up and squawk away for hours. That slip joint was a vital deck
accessory to prevent the ship from splitting in two in heavy seas.
My wife and I are in the photo of the Ship's Party taken in the Crystal
Room of the Hotel Ritz-Carlton in New York City. I have a couple of originals
here in my stuff. Hell's fire, Frank, I've kept everything. In our family
room, hangs and 11x14" of the Edison in color (the one passing under the
Brooklyn Bridge). It is framed in white oak and on the frame is the "U.S.S.
Edison" nameplate from the telephone system in the electrician's shack. Ted
Rykowski got it for me in the Philly navy yard when the ship was there for
scrapping.
I certainly have enjoyed communicating with you and I enjoyed your notes,
thoughts and loved the book. All the best in the world to you and if you ever
pass through or near Lafayette, Indiana, we're easy to find in the phone book.
Sincerely and very best wishes
An old shipmate, Bud Cloyd.
To this letter, the author replied, "What are burner batters?" So Cloyd
came back with the following on June 10, 1999.
Over a rather lengthy period of service I actually stood every watch there
was to stand in connection with the black gang of a destroyer. This included
burners, blowers, and feed check in the firerooms and messenger, pumps,
evaporators and throttles in the engine rooms with a stint as engineer of the
captain's gig thrown in for good measure. Your concern was with "burner
batters," so I'll try to explain that.
The Edison, as were all WWII vessels, was equipped with Babcock &
Wilcox triple drum, water tube boilers. The Edison had four, two in each
fireroom to generate steam for the main propulsion turbines. There were three
turbines in each engine room--HP for speed and maneuvering, LP for reverse
(backing down and some maneuvering) and cruising for low speed and for lengthy
cruising to economize on fuel. The HP turbines were 25,000 horsepower and they
could consume an astonishing amount of steam and fuel in a very short time but
they also gave the Edison the maneuvering ability of an overgrown motorboat.
Or at least Hap Pearce (the skipper of the Edison for her coverage of assault
landings-Ed.) thought so.
To make it simple, the whole idea was to create one helluva lot of steam in
one helluva hurry in both firerooms. The Edison carried 620-625 pounds of
steam super-heated to 750 degrees. Steam at that temperature becomes
invisible.
All four furnaces under the boilers carried four huge fuel oil burners with
various size sprayer plates on the end of a steel barrel some foot and a half
long and about two inches in diameter. The oil line was hooked to the end of
the barrel with a quick opening butterfly and the barrels were slammed into
the furnace as the man on burner watch simultaneously slammed open the air
shutters from huge, turbine driven blowers operated by the man on blower watch
who HAD to coordinate his blower control with the burner man else there would
be a belch of black smoke and that was a NO--NO!
All manner of sprayer plate sizes were available for quick changing to
control the flow of oil through the burners. That oil came out in a fog so it
would ignite instantly throwing an intense blanket of heat over the water
tubes from the boilers just as instantly creating one huge amount of steam.
When maneuvering, steam pressure was never to fall below 500 PSI or the main
turbines were in danger of pulling feed water into their fragile vanes.
When at battle stations, a very few select men were chosen for burner
watch. Oddly enough, fireman recruits always started their training on the
burners. Nevertheless, those men were termed as "batting burners" for that is
exactly what they did. They slammed them into the furnace as quick and as hard
as they could throw them and slammed the gates open. When Hap Pearce (that
same skipper again-Ed.) decided to go from dead in the water to flank speed
you can well imaging what broke loose among those men batting burners. Let it
be a matter of great pride among the Edison engineers that not once was there
a failure to answer a bell with all the power that could be mustered and not
once did the safeties lift at 635 PPSI.
My period of watch time in the fireroom was three months and I can most
emphatically state that I hated every minute of it although I finally became
acceptably adept at batting burners without someone peering over my shoulders
to be sure I didn't foul something up. The balance of my time on the Edison
was spent as a member of the auxiliary gang with watches in the engine room. I
liked that except for the god-awful heat. This barely touches on the
complicated mechanical world below decks but it will at least explain what a
burner batter was and how critical his performance was to the welfare of the
ship.
Some weeks ago I was reading a rundown somewhere of some of the ships that
were in Tokyo Bay when the Japanese surrender was signed. Darned if I can
remember where I read it--maybe it was in an edition of Tin Can Sailor.
Nevertheless, it stated that one 1630 ton destroyer was anchored in the Bay on
that historic date and it was believed to be the Benson, DD421. That would
account for the 1630 in that photo we shared earlier (Illustration 41 in the
book-Ed.). Certainly the Benson was in the fleet of cans that left the Med and
the Atlantic to serve in the Pacific. She was in good condition the last time
I remember her.
So you have been invited to visit the Mayo group. That sounds great. I
remember the night the Mayo 423 and Plunkett 431 both were badly damaged at
Anzio, both with extensive casualties. I'm sure you do too. My most graphic
memory of Anzio was a time when I just happened to be on deck when I saw a
steel-hulled minesweep working some distance off our starboard quarter. I
think it may have been in the area immediately at sea from the Pontine
Marshes. I was watching the minesweep at the instant the ship blew up when it
struck a mine. Nothing was left but debris floating around. What an experience
that was. Best regards and keep in touch. /s/ Bud Cloyd MM2/c
To which the author replied, "What are burner batters?" So Cloyd came right
back with the following on June 10, 1999.
Over a rather lengthy period of service I actually stood every watch there
was to stand in connection with the black gang of a destroyer. This included
burners, blowers, and feed check in the firerooms and messenger, pumps,
evaporators and throttles in the engine rooms with a stint as engineer of the
captain's gig thrown in for good measure. Your concern was with "burner
batters," so I'll try to explain that.
The Edison, as were all WWII vessels, was equipped with Babcock &
Wilcox triple drum, water tube boilers. The Edison had four, two in each
fireroom to generate steam for the main propulsion turbines. There were three
turbines in each engine room--HP for speed and maneuvering, LP for reverse
(backing down and some maneuvering) and cruising for low speed and for lengthy
cruising to economize on fuel. The HP turbines were 25,000 horsepower and they
could consume an astonishing amount of steam and fuel in a very short time but
they also gave the Edison the maneuvering ability of an overgrown motorboat.
Or at least Hap Pearce (the skipper of the Edison for her coverage of assault
landings-Ed.) thought so.
To make it simple, the whole idea was to create one helluva lot of steam in
one helluva hurry in both firerooms. The Edison carried 620-625 pounds of
steam super-heated to 750 degrees. Steam at that temperature becomes
invisible.
All four furnaces under the boilers carried four huge fuel oil burners with
various size sprayer plates on the end of a steel barrel some foot and a half
long and about two inches in diameter. The oil line was hooked to the end of
the barrel with a quick opening butterfly and the barrels were slammed into
the furnace as the man on burner watch simultaneously slammed open the air
shutters from huge, turbine driven blowers operated by the man on blower watch
who HAD to coordinate his blower control with the burner man else there would
be a belch of black smoke and that was a NO--NO!
All manner of sprayer plate sizes were available for quick changing to
control the flow of oil through the burners. That oil came out in a fog so it
would ignite instantly throwing an intense blanket of heat over the water
tubes from the boilers just as instantly creating one huge amount of steam.
When maneuvering, steam pressure was never to fall below 500 PSI or the main
turbines were in danger of pulling feed water into their fragile vanes.
When at battle stations, a very few select men were chosen for burner
watch. Oddly enough, fireman recruits always started their training on the
burners. Nevertheless, those men were termed as "batting burners" for that is
exactly what they did. They slammed them into the furnace as quick and as hard
as they could throw them and slammed the gates open. When Hap Pearce (that
same skipper again-Ed.) decided to go from dead in the water to flank speed
you can well imaging what broke loose among those men batting burners. Let it
be a matter of great pride among the Edison engineers that not once was there
a failure to answer a bell with all the power that could be mustered and not
once did the safeties lift at 635 PPSI.
My period of watch time in the fireroom was three months and I can most
emphatically state that I hated every minute of it although I finally became
acceptably adept at batting burners without someone peering over my shoulders
to be sure I didn't foul something up. The balance of my time on the Edison
was spent as a member of the auxiliary gang with watches in the engine room. I
liked that except for the god-awful heat. This barely touches on the
complicated mechanical world below decks but it will at least explain what a
burner batter was and how critical his performance was to the welfare of the
ship.
Some weeks ago I was reading a rundown somewhere of some of the ships that
were in Tokyo Bay when the Japanese surrender was signed. Darned if I can
remember where I read it--maybe it was in an edition of Tin Can Sailor.
Nevertheless, it stated that one 1630 ton destroyer was anchored in the Bay on
that historic date and it was believed to be the Benson, DD421. That would
account for the 1630 in that photo we shared earlier (Illustration 41 in the
book-Ed.). Certainly the Benson was in the fleet of cans that left the Med and
the Atlantic to serve in the Pacific. She was in good condition the last time
I remember her.
So you have been invited to visit the Mayo group. That sounds great. I
remember the night the Mayo 422 and Plunkett 431 both were badly damaged at
Anzio, both with extensive casualties. I'm sure you do too. My most graphic
memory of Anzio was a time when I just happened to be on deck when I saw a
steel-hulled minesweep working some distance off our starboard quarter. I
think it may have been in the area immediately at sea from the Pontine
Marshes. I was watching the minesweep at the instant the ship blew up when it
struck a mine. Nothing was left but debris floating around. What an experience
that was. Best regards and keep in touch. /s/ Bud Cloyd MM2/c
Return to the
USS Edison DD439 site